Latest 2V0-13.24 Exam Questions Vce | Reliable 2V0-13.24 Dumps Sheet
We will try our best to solve your problems for you. I believe that you will be more inclined to choose a good service product, such as 2V0-13.24 learning question. After all, everyone wants to be treated warmly and kindly, and hope to learn in a more pleasant mood. The authoritative, efficient, and thoughtful service of 2V0-13.24 learning question will give you the best user experience, and you can also get what you want with our study materials. I hope our study materials can accompany you to pursue your dreams. If you can choose 2V0-13.24 test guide, we will be very happy. We look forward to meeting you.
VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Syllabus Topics:
Topic
Details
Topic 1
Topic 2
Topic 3
Topic 4
Topic 5
>> Latest 2V0-13.24 Exam Questions Vce <<
2025 Latest 2V0-13.24 Exam Questions Vce | Valid Reliable 2V0-13.24 Dumps Sheet: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect 100% Pass
If you care about your qualification exams and have some queries about 2V0-13.24 preparation materials, we are pleased to serve for you, you can feel free to contact us via email or online service about your doubt. Our company are established more than 10 years, our quality of 2V0-13.24 valid practice test questions are the leading position in this filed. We believe our 2V0-13.24 exam guide will help you pass exam easily without too much spirit & time. All our 2V0-13.24 training materials are compiled painstakingly.
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Sample Questions (Q114-Q119):
NEW QUESTION # 114
Which two design decisions are key when ensuring availability for workloads across multiple availability zones in VMware Cloud Foundation?
(Choose two)
Response:
Answer: B,D
NEW QUESTION # 115
Which two design decisions are crucial for meeting disaster recovery requirements in VMware Cloud Foundation?
(Choose two)
Response:
Answer: C,D
NEW QUESTION # 116
Which of the following is a key consideration when differentiating between availability, manageability, performance, recoverability, and security (AMPRS)?
Response:
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 117
A company plans to expand its existing VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) environment for a new application.
The current VCF environment includes a Management Domain and two separate VI Workload Domains with different hardware profiles. The new application has the following requirements:
The application will use significantly more memory than current workloads.
The application will have a limited number of licenses to run on hosts.
Additional VCF and hardware costs have been approved for the application.
The application will contain confidential customer information that requires isolation from other workloads.
What design recommendation should the architect document?
Answer: D
Explanation:
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, expanding an existing environment for a new application involves balancing resource needs, licensing, cost, and security. The requirements-high memory, limited licenses, approved budget, and isolation-guide the design. Let's evaluate:
Option A: Implement a new Workload Domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements of the new application This is correct. A new VI Workload Domain (minimum 3-4 hosts, depending on vSAN HA) can be tailored to the application's high memory needs with new hardware. Isolation is achieved by dedicating the domain to the application, separating it from existing workloads (e.g., via NSX segmentation). Limited licenses can be managed by sizing the domain to match the license count (e.g., 4 hosts if licensed for 4),and the approved budget supports this. This aligns with VCF's Standard architecture for workload separation and scalability.
Option B: Deploy a new consolidated VCF instance and deploy the new application into it This is incorrect. A consolidated VCF instance runs management and workloads on a single cluster (4-8 hosts), mixing the new application with management components. This violates the isolation requirement for confidential data, as management and application workloads share infrastructure. It also overcomplicates licensing and memory allocation, and a new instance exceeds the intent of "expanding" the existing environment.
Option C: Purchase sufficient matching hardware to meet the new application's memory requirements and expand an existing cluster to accommodate the new application. Use host affinity rules to manage the new licensing This is incorrect. Expanding an existing VI Workload Domain cluster with matching hardware (to maintain vSAN compatibility) could meet memory needs, and DRS affinity rules could pin the application to licensed hosts. However, mixing the new application with existing workloads in the same domain compromises isolation for confidential data. NSX segmentation helps, but a shared cluster increases risk, making this less secure than a dedicated domain.
Option D: Order enough identical hardware for the Management Domain to meet the new application requirements and design a new Workload Domain for the application This is incorrect. Upgrading the Management Domain (minimum 4 hosts) with high-memory hardware for the application is illogical-management domains host SDDC Manager, vCenter, etc., not user workloads. A new Workload Domain is feasible, but tying it to Management Domain hardware mismatches the VCF architecture (Management and VI domains have distinct roles). This misinterprets the requirement and wastes resources.
Conclusion:The architect should recommendA: Implement a new Workload Domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements of the new application. This meets all requirements-memory, licensing (via domain sizing), budget (approved costs), and isolation (dedicated domain)-within VCF 5.2's Standard architecture.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Workload Domain Design) VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Isolation and Sizing)
NEW QUESTION # 118
An architect was requested to recommend a solution for migrating 5000 VMs from an existing vSphere environment to a new VMware Cloud Foundation infrastructure. Which feature or tool can be recommended by the architect to minimize downtime and automate the process?
Answer: A
Explanation:
When migrating 5000 virtual machines (VMs) from an existing vSphere environment to a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 infrastructure, the primary goals are to minimize downtime and automate the process as much as possible. VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 is a full-stack hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) solution that integrates vSphere, vSAN, NSX, and Aria Suite for a unified private cloud experience.
Given the scale of the migration (5000 VMs) and the requirement to transition from an existing vSphere environment to a new VCF infrastructure, the architect must select a tool that supports large-scale migrations, minimizes downtime, and provides automation capabilities across potentially different environments or data centers.
Let's evaluate each option in detail:
A: VMware HCX:VMware HCX (Hybrid Cloud Extension) is an application mobility platform designed specifically for large-scale workload migrations between vSphere environments, including migrations to VMware Cloud Foundation. HCX is included in VCF Enterprise Edition and provides advanced features such as zero-downtime live migration, bulk migration, and network extension. It automates the creation of hybrid interconnects between source and destination environments, enabling seamless VM mobility without requiring IP address changes (via Layer 2 network extension). HCX supports migrations from older vSphere versions (as early as vSphere 5.1) to the latest versions included in VCF 5.2, making it ideal for brownfield-to- greenfield transitions. For a migration of 5000 VMs, HCX's ability to perform bulk migrations (hundreds of VMs simultaneously) and its high-availability features (e.g., redundant appliances) ensure minimal disruption and efficient automation. HCX also integrates with VCF's SDDC Manager, aligning with the centralized management paradigm of VCF 5.2.
B: vSphere vMotion:vSphere vMotion enables live migration of running VMs from one ESXi host to another within the same vCenter Server instance with zero downtime. While this is an excellent tool for migrations within a single data center or vCenter environment, it is limited to hosts managed by the same vCenter Server.
Migrating VMs to a new VCF infrastructure typically involves a separate vCenter instance (e.g., a new management domain in VCF), which vMotion alone cannot handle. For 5000 VMs, vMotion would require manual intervention for each VM and would not scale efficiently across different environments or data centers, making it unsuitable as the primary tool for this scenario.
C: VMware Converter:VMware Converter is a tool designed to convert physical machines or other virtual formats (e.g., Hyper-V) into VMware VMs. It is primarily used for physical-to-virtual (P2V) or virtual-to- virtual (V2V) conversions rather than migrating existing VMware VMs between vSphere environments.
Converter involves downtime, as it requires powering off the source VM, cloning it, and then powering it on in the destination environment. For 5000 VMs, this process would be extremely time-consuming, lack automation for large-scale migrations, and fail to meet the requirement of minimizing downtime, rendering it an impractical choice.
D: Cross vCenter vMotion:Cross vCenter vMotion extends vMotion's capabilities to migrate VMs between different vCenter Server instances, even across data centers, with zero downtime. While this feature is powerful and could theoretically be used to move VMs to a new VCF environment, it requires both environments to be linked within the same Enhanced Linked Mode configuration and assumes compatible vSphere versions. For 5000 VMs, Cross vCenter vMotion lacks the bulk migration and automation capabilities offered by HCX, requiring significant manual effort to orchestrate the migration. Additionally, it does not provide network extension or the same level of integration with VCF's architecture as HCX.
Why VMware HCX is the Best Choice:VMware HCX stands out as the recommended solution for this scenario due to its ability to handle large-scale migrations (up to hundreds of VMs concurrently), minimize downtime via live migration, and automate the process through features like network extension and migration scheduling. HCX is explicitly highlighted in VCF 5.2 documentation as a key tool for workload migration, especially for importing existing vSphere environments into VCF (e.g., via the VCF Import Tool, which complements HCX). Its support for both live and scheduled migrations ensures flexibility, while its integration with VCF 5.2's SDDC Manager streamlines management. For a migration of 5000 VMs, HCX's scalability, automation, and minimal downtime capabilities make it the superior choice over the other options.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Release Notes (techdocs.broadcom.com)
VMware Cloud Foundation Deployment Guide (docs.vmware.com)
"Enabling Workload Migrations with VMware Cloud Foundation and VMware HCX" (blogs.vmware.com, May 3, 2022)
NEW QUESTION # 119
......
The quality of our VMware 2V0-13.24 training material is excellent. After all, we have undergone about ten years' development. Never has our practice test let customers down. Although we also face many challenges and troubles, our company get over them successfully. If you are determined to learn some useful skills, our VMware 2V0-13.24 Real Dumps will be your good assistant. Then you will seize the good chance rather than others.
Reliable 2V0-13.24 Dumps Sheet: https://www.pass4guide.com/2V0-13.24-exam-guide-torrent.html